MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2004-06-03 00:20:48 +0100 Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Perhaps it simply means that they retain copyright in their portions, > > not > > that they're stealing your derivative works. That would require a > > statement from the copyright holder before I'd belive it, though. > > As you note, the "stealing your work" view requires some word-bending > and would probably be invalid, so do we really *need* clarification? > > Then again, someone may want to contact them about the aggressive tone > in general anyway.
If they really meant to "steal" the work, then the whole license may be invalid. In which case, Debian has no permission to distribute at all. So I think a clarification is definitely in order. Regards, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
