Diego Biurrun wrote: > On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 01:22:24PM +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote: >> >> +------------+ +-------------+ +-------------+ >> | | | | | | >> | A | | B | | C | >> | | | | | | >> | SystemC |<--1-->| My software |<--2-->| GCC | >> | | | | | | >> +------------+ +-------------+ +-------------+ >> >> Where <--n--> can be either a static or a dynamic link. >> >> I would like to use as permissive licenses as possible. Ideally, I >> would like the following : >> >> A = SystemC license >> B = LGPL >> C = GPL > > gcc is LGPL.
No. GCC has different parts under different licenses (although all are GPL-compatible). Parts are GPL, parts are LGPL, parts are GPL with special libgcc exception, etc. -- There are none so blind as those who will not see.
