On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 10:56:13AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > On 2004-05-03 15:24:00 +0100 Claus Färber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Rememer that an "ad-clause" usually does not render a work non-free, > > just incompatible with the GPL. [...] > > An "ad-clause" usually applies to documentation or advertising supplied > with the software, not the software package itself, and only requires > attribution not a large advert. It sails very close to the wind, but > doesn't quite fall over.
And even then, some of us are willing to go to some fairly large amount of
effort to try to convince upstreams to switch to a license without one...
--
Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ,''`.
Debian GNU/kNetBSD(i386) porter : :' :
`. `'
http://nienna.lightbearer.com/ `-
pgpaldQc4SmED.pgp
Description: PGP signature
