Hello, I am now packaging a Tetris-like game, and I have some doubts about the description.
I have written the description like this: Description: Free clone of Tetris, featuring a bastard level Bastet (stands for "bastard Tetris") is a free (GPL'd) clone of Tetris(r) (built on the top of petris by Peter Seidler) which is designed to be "as bastard as possible": it tries to compute how useful blocks are and gives you the worst, the most bastard it can find. Playing bastet can be a painful experience, especially if you usually make "canyons" and wait for the long I-shaped block. As Tetris is a trademark, are the uses of this word proper? I mean, is it legal to make use of this word as I have written it on the description? Now, the upstream author mentions his software is based on petris, a Tetris-like game on MIT/X11 license. Is it all valid to bastet use GPL? Bastet is licensed over GPL. I only need some orientation, in order to make bastet Debian policy-compliant. Regards and thanks in advance, -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.damog.net/ PGP 356E16CD - 84F0 E180 8AF6 E8D0 842F B520 63F3 08DB 356E 16CD
