"Lex Spoon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've posted a summary of the discussion on including Squeak in non-free: > > http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3733 > > I'll edit it as issues come up. There are two open issues:
The indemnification clause is _not_ acceptable. Using phrases like "it is extremely unlikely" won't cut it. > 1. Export regs. Are our servers up to snuff for avoiding export to US > embargoed countries? (It looks to me that we need to handle this > anyway, even aside from Squeak's license.) As I understand it, the US servers do not export software to those countries. However, probably not all of the non-us mirrors check whether a request originates from Cuba [1]. In that case, the mirrors would be violating the license (but no law that applies to them). This is different from what I said before, because I didn't think about mirrors outside the US redistributing software to Cuba. Regards, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1] The mail that was sent to the mirrors for the crypto-in-main transition is at http://lists.debian.org/debian-mirrors/2002/debian-mirrors-200202/msg00001.html Checking for country of origin was a suggestion, not a requirement.
