Per Olofsson wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 08:10 -0400, Walter Landry wrote: >>Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>There seems to be some confusion about whether the GNU FDL renders >>>every document non-free or only those that include invariant >>>sections. The result is that... er... I am confused as well... >>> >>>Could somebody enlighten me? >> >>When the GFDL was originally inspected, the conclusion was that the >>GFDL was free as long as there were no invariant sections (and maybe >>some other sections). Since then, other problems have been discovered >>that make all GFDL documents non-free. > > I think most of them are summarised [1]here. > > [1] http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.html
And in Nathanael Nerode's excellent "Why You Shouldn't Use the GNU FDL" paper, at http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html . - Josh Triplett
