Sami Liedes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Cc:'d to the reiser4progs maintainers. Please Cc: me when replying, > I'm not subscribed to -legal.] > > There has previously been discussion at least in April 2003 on this > list about the freeness of reiserfs. > > It seems a further "clarification" has been added to the license (GPL > + clarifications) in both reiser4progs and kernel-patch-2.6-reiser4 > since then.
I agree that they make reiser4 non-free. In addition, they make it GPL-incompatible, so Debian won't be able to ship reiser4 even in non-free. Regards, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
