* Henning Makholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040423 01:25]: > Scripsit Jeremy Hankins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Perhaps we should think about language to add to the DFSG for this > > kind of case? > I wish you luck. But we can never be sure that any formulation of the > DFSG will describe exactly the next kind of non-freeness we come > across.
I learned during university that any system which is not conflicting itself has gaps in it. As the DFSG are not conflicting itself .... Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
