On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 10:17:25AM -0500, Jeremy Hankins wrote: > My fear is that, as Don seems to be showing, people will oversimplify > and miss the limitations. Getting people to think in terms of > "modification" instead of "DFSG 3" seems useful.
Hmm, I think I missed the start of this thread, so maybe I'm missine something, but from what I see, the key question seems to be: is this intended a teaching tool or a reference? If the former, then "getting people to think" is an issue. If the latter, then perhaps we can assume that people can already think. If it's trying to be both, then I suspect it will be, of necessity, less than perfect in either role. -- Chris Waters | Pneumonoultra- osis is too long [EMAIL PROTECTED] | microscopicsilico- to fit into a single or [EMAIL PROTECTED] | volcaniconi- standalone haiku
