Hi guys, Bug#211765, "xfree86: material under non-free licenses in XFree86" appears to have been languishing for a few months now, without anyone trying to talk to the copyright holders to see if this stuff can be relicensed in a DFSG-free fashion.
Is there someone on this list who's interested in talking to upstream copyright holders and trying to work through possible DFSG conflicts like these? That usually means either presenting a convincing argument that what they want is actually more harmful than it seems in practical terms, or that there's some better way of achieving the same goal, without running afoul of the DFSG. That's not particularly easy, and can often be not particularly fruitful, but promoting free software principles to people who're inclined to write non-free licenses is one of the things we're meant to be doing. So, is there anyone here with the time and energy to look into this issue, and ideally others? Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we can. http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
