On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:16:21 +0200 Piotr Roszatycki wrote: > I think it is BSD-like license with advertising clause. Is it fit to > the main archive?
What you quoted is *exactly* the 3-clause BSD license, with *no* OAC (Obnoxious Advertising Clause). You can compare with /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD (as I did) or with http://www.fsf.org/licenses/info/BSD_3Clause.html in case you want to check by yourself. Any work released under such a license can go in main, provided that * there is no indication that the copyright holder interprets the license in some unusual (and non-free) ways * the work is unencumbered by actively enforced software patents -- Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday. ...................................................................... Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpQf9oj1DIag.pgp
Description: PGP signature
