On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 11:49:45PM -0400, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: > You're right that this could be more clearly phrased, and I think > talking to Sun about that can only be helpful. But I don't think > javacc is non-free in the meantime.
I have no problem with this summary, as long as Sun acts in a reasonable fashion [at least as reasonably as the FSF] in issuing a better license for javacc. Thanks, -- Raul
