[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >In both cases, the quantity of non-free software used has remained the >same. The purpose of contrib is to discourage free software with >non-free dependencies. Deciding whether software falls into it or not >purely based on another vendor's choice of media seems mad. Either we >disapprove of hardware that requires non-free firmware, or we don't - >whether it has to be on the user's hard drive is a hardware >implementation issue, not a philosophical difference. This is my position too.
-- ciao, Marco
