It's a perfectly reasonable means to discriminate. One is *in the hardware*. If I buy a widget, I don't care whether it uses firmware in an eeprom or a well-trained gerbil. It's a box. Software on my CPU is different. -- Brian Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- non-free firmware: driver in main or contrib? Aurelien Jarno
- Re: non-free firmware: driver in main or contrib... Francesco Poli
- Re: non-free firmware: driver in main or con... Marco d'Itri
- Re: non-free firmware: driver in main or... Evan Prodromou
- Re: non-free firmware: driver in mai... Marco d'Itri
- Re: non-free firmware: driver i... Lewis Jardine
- Re: non-free firmware: driv... Marco d'Itri
- Re: non-free firmware: ... Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: non-free firmware: ... Matthew Garrett
- Re: non-free firmware: ... Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: non-free firmware: ... Marco d'Itri
- Re: non-free firmware: ... Matthew Garrett
- Re: non-free firmware: ... Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: non-free firmware: ... Matthew Garrett
- Re: non-free firmware: ... Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: non-free firmware: ... Raul Miller
- Re: non-free firmware: ... Marco d'Itri
- Re: non-free firmware: ... Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: non-free firmware: ... Andreas Barth
- Re: non-free firmware: ... Brian Thomas Sniffen