Scripsit Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > I think Alexander's point may have merit. If you distribute whatever > > precise bits it was that the copyright holder waved a copy of the GPL > > over, those bits must be assumed to be "the Program", and as such GPL > > #2 gives you right to distribute a modified version of the bits. > At least, the way I read the GPL, 2 gives you the right to distribute > a modified version of the Program Source (which is what 1 covers). Are we reading different versions of the license? The one I'm looking at (/usr/share/emacs/20.7/etc/COPYING from woody's emacs20 package) does not mention the word "source" in its section 2 at all. #1 explicitly applies only to "the Program's source code", but #2 speaks generally about "the Program", source code or not. -- Henning Makholm "Al lykken er i ét ord: Overvægtig!"
