On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:32:20 -0500, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:37:37 +0000 (UTC)
>> Dylan Thurston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I'm not sure going point-by-point through the text of the license
>>> is the best way to proceed; I feel like the main point gets a
>>> little lost. For instance, the DRM issues, which RMS has said the
>>> FSF will address (eventually), happen to come up first, while I
>>> feel the heart of the disagreement is over the invariant sections.
>>> At least, I would have some executive summary at the beginning.
> If you would provide suggested wording for the most egregious
> perceived flaws, we could add that in, with hyperlinks deeper into
> the document for details.
I have now updated the document with a nascent Overview
section, which at this point contains only links. I also have added a
few responses by rms to some of the concerns voiced about the DFSG.
Again, the document lives at:
<URL:http://people.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml>
or, if your browser balks ath the xml+xhtml mime type, at:
<URL:http://people.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/Position_Statement.html>
manoj
--
Rudeness is a weak man's imitation of strength.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
