On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 04:37:42PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > So you are now retracting your original argument, and instead claiming > that developers chose to ignore this problem *without* investigating > the details? In future please state your two-line arguments instead of > using eight-line vague analogies. > > This is a different assertion to your original one. It is also even > more unlikely, because it assumes Debian developers acted out of > deliberate ignorance.
Oh, I wouldn't call "acting out of deliberate ignorance" unlikely at all. Look at how we're (officially) coping with the Sun RPC license problem. -- G. Branden Robinson | Mob rule isn't any prettier just Debian GNU/Linux | because you call your mob a [EMAIL PROTECTED] | government. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
