On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Fedor Zuev wrote: >> First, try to answer to several simply questions. > FYI, these are *my* answers, not necessarily everyone's answers.
>> 0) Is printed Emacs Manual in bookstore a software or hardware? > The lump of paper and ink is hardware. Including the various > splotchesof ink resulting from printing press problems. But the > 'text of the manual',that abstract entity embodied in the manual, > is software. >> 1) Is Emacs Manual recorded on CD-Audio a software or hardware? > The bits are software, the lump of plastic is hardware. >> 2) Is Debian/main printed as book a software or hardware? > The hunk of paper is hardware, the 'text' in it is software. >> 3) Why? What differs from 0,1? > Nothing. >> 4) Is Debian/main printed into punch-cards a software or hardware? > The physical punch cards are hardware, the data on them is > software. >> 5) Why? What differs from 0,1,2? > Nothing. >> 6) Is Debian/main written on CD-ROM a software or hardware? > The lump of plastic is hardware. The data on it is software. >> 7) Why? What differs from 0, 1,2,4? > Nothing. >> 8)Is Debian logo written on [cover of] the same CD-ROM software >> or hardware? > Neither, really, but... The printed cover with its actual copy of > the logo,possibly with some dirt, etc., is hardware. The logo as > a copyrightable entity embodied on the cover is software. BTW, there you mentioned the important factor: copyright status. But you completely abandoned this subject below. >> 9) Why? What differs from 0, 1, 2, 4, 6? >Nothing. >> 10) Is Debian installation, hardcoded into embedded system >> software or hardware? >This is usually called "firmware". Again, the lump of silicon and >metalcircuits is hardware, and the data hardcoded into it is >software. >>11) Why? What differs from 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8? >Nothing. >To answer a question you didn't ask, the *design spec* for >a piece of hardware is software. The hardware itself isn't.Get the >picture? Yes, this is a good question. But I have also another good questions. Especially for you (see below). > This is the extremely useful definition of software I > use.(Software is a more useful term for discrete/digital data than > for continuous/analog data, because continuous/analog data can't be > reproduced without data loss, making the software inseperable from > the hardware to some degree.) So, according to your defintion "software" is synonym to "digital information". Right? Song written on CDDA is a software, whereas the song written on a analog magnetic tape (exactly the same object from the copyright|licensing perspective) is not a software. Right? Speech, transmissed over digital telephone line is a software, whereas speech, transmissed over analog telephone line (you even do not know, which is the case) is not software. Right? Picture, printed by good printer is a software, whereas picture printed by broken printer (too many ink) is not software. Right? Do you really believe that DFSG was designed to make such subtle (and strange) differences?