Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté : > On Friday 26 September 2003, at 14 h 23, > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Compare: > > > > http://web.archive.org/web/20021128102620/http://www.gnu.org/links/links.ht= > > ml > > > > with: > > [ http://www.gnu.org/links/links.html ] > > Funny, FSF does not mention Debian or FreeBSD anymore,
An explanation has been added <http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/links/links.html.diff?r1=1.28&r2=1.29&diff_format=h&cvsroot=www.gnu.org> * OpenBSD was removed because of mpg123... Well, it cannot imagine that it was not possible to convince OpenBSD people to replace it with mpg321. Strange. <http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/links/links.html.diff?r1=1.27&r2=1.28&diff_format=h&cvsroot=www.gnu.org> * NetBSD and FreeBSD links were removed because "they have proprietary software packages that the distribute on their respective websites". <http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/links/links.html.diff?r1=1.26&r2=1.27&diff_format=h&cvsroot=www.gnu.org> For NetBSD, I think that's it: <http://www.netbsd.org/gallery/software.html> For FreeBSD, I did not found the problem on the website. Anyway, it's not a big surprise that *BSD refers to non-free software since the BSD licenses permits building non-free software with their code. * Debian has been removed because of the non-free part. <http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/links/links.html.diff?r1=1.24&r2=1.25&diff_format=h&cvsroot=www.gnu.org> It has been done "5 weeks, 4 days ago". I hope this has nothing to do with the GFDL issue, which should be treated as a separated issue, if we are not planning to start a war. Sadly, it sounds like a divorce is near. We all have something to loose here. -- Mathieu Roy Homepage: http://yeupou.coleumes.org Not a native english speaker: http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english
