Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >>The DFSG lists three specific licenses that are meant to satisfy its > >>criteria. Nowadays some Debian developers tend to say that these > >>three licenses are listed as exceptions to the rules of the DFSG, but > >>I think that is a misinterpretation. I think they are meant as > >>examples to help people understand what the DFSG criteria mean. An > >>interpretation of the rules which would lead to rejecting any of thee > >>licenses is the wrong interpretation. > > I think you are right. Note that the DFSG is not listed. > > You mean that the GFDL is not listed, of course.
Right.
