Le dim 21/09/2003 à 15:52, Mathieu Roy a écrit : > > The DFSG are for the Debian OS. Not for the Debian project. Please > > stop mixing these two notions, they are not identical. > > You failed to convince me. But if it helps you to see things that way, > feel free to do it...
I'm afraid many people here are not trying to convince you, but rather to get rid of you. > > I'm not sure the GNU project is more consistent than the Debian > > project is: its major goal is to provide freedom to the users, yet it > > publishes non-free documentation > > This is a mistake. > It publishes free documentation according to GNU, non-free according > to Debian. You seem to forget the GNU project also publishes non-free, entirely unmodifiable essays. (BTW, I don't believe the GFDL to be free even using the GNU definition of freedom.) > > It's not playing on words. It's just how things are. When you buy > > a car from brand X, you don't get any rights on the trademark X, or on > > the X logo. > > Yes, and I do not claim that the logo Renault on my car is not part of > my car. The official Debian logo means endorsement by the Debian PROJECT. Do you understand what is the Debian PROJECT ? A DD-wannabe like you should be aware of the distinction between the project and the OS. The official Debian logo is not included in the Debian OS (read: it is not on your car), it is a mark of approval by the community of Debian developers (read: it is on the Renault dealer's sign). -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
