* Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030920 21:50]: > On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Joe Drew wrote: > > Contrary to popular belief, the McDonald's coffee case was not > > frivolous. > > > > http://www.centerjd.org/free/mythbusters-free/MB_mcdonalds.htm
> First off, hot coffee causes 2nd degree burns, not 3rd degree > burns.[1] > 1: Assuming that you're not going swiming in the stuff, of course. In this case she did "swim" in it, see also http://www.lectlaw.com/files/cur78.htm (which describes that case IMHO much better). No, it's not "indicative of larger judgements". Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
