On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 06:47:31PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote: > And you are sure that this phrase is part of an Invariant section?
Yes. (2x) > > When you look at which kind of text IS marked invariant in the manuals > > under discussion, you'll find that the FSF has a much broader idea of > > Secondary Sections than the one you're using in your arguments. > > Can you be more specific? An example perhaps? I gave you one: the Distribution section of the Emacs manual. That's what I was quoting from. Emacs 21.3+1-3, to be precise. -- Richard Braakman There's still time to save Europe from software patents. EuropeSwPatentFree - http://EuropeSwPatentFree.internautas.org
