Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> On Saturday 20 September 2003 02:16, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > You seem to be suggesting that this would satisfy the distribution terms of
> > the GFDL. Are you really suggesting this? If so, we may have a solution.
>
> Unfortunately, the invariant sections are not the only issue for non-freeness
> of GFDL.
Please, try to be constructive. The invariant section is the only
(apparently) philosophical issue. The others issues are clearly
practical, it's easier to get rid of it.
--
Mathieu Roy
Homepage:
http://yeupou.coleumes.org
Not a native english speaker:
http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english
