Scripsit Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 8. Claims of Infringement. If Recipient at any time has knowledge of > > any one or more third party claims that reproduction, > > modification, use, distribution, import or sale of Subject > > Software (including particular functionality or code incorporated > > in Subject Software) infringes the third party's intellectual > > property rights, Recipient must place in a well-identified web page > > bearing the title "LEGAL" a description of each such claim and a > > description of the party making each such claim in sufficient > > detail that a user of the Subject Software will know whom to > > contact regarding the claim.
> Not sure which portions of XFree this license applies to, but I bet I > can come up with some material. I'll then just mail -legal about it and > Debian will have to put up a page describing it. Don't use too much time searching - I hereby claim that whichever code in XFree86 that is covered by this notice, infringes *my* intellectual property rights. Of course I'm wrong, but I claim it all the same, so now Debian has to put up a LEGAL page. Shall I file a bug report against www.debian.org myself? > So Debian would be compelled to notify all our users about it with > steps "reasonably calculated to inform those who received the Subject > Software." Not sure what those steps would have to be, but I'd assume > fairly extensive. I think I'll settle for having new xfree86 packages being put on security.debian.org with a priority "high" debconf splash screen in its postinst script. :-) > > 7. Claims of Infringement. If Recipient learns of any third party claim > > that any disposition of Covered Code and/or functionality wholly or > > partially infringes the third party's intellectual property rights, > > Recipient will promptly notify SGI of such claim. > This is doable, Doable, perhaps. Free, no. -- Henning Makholm "`Update' isn't a bad word; in the right setting it is useful. In the wrong setting, though, it is destructive..."