Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The principal argument in favor of the GFDL seems > to be "this is the only way we can get our message out". > > The GNU Project's motive for using invariant sections is not the issue > here; that's a GNU Project decision, not a Debian decision.
You are arguing that you should have a voice in what Debian does. It seems only fair to allow that Debian should have a voice in what the GNU Project does. Regardless, I am a part of the GNU Project. Shall we take a poll to see whether the GNU Project agrees with your goals here? > The question at hand is whether Debian should accept or reject > GFDL-covered manuals. The argument for that is that there are many > such manuals and they would be useful to include, and the DFSG can > be interpreted to accept it. This is the same argument that non-free software producers give us all the time. Thomas
