Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > All I want to say about the new issue is that a small fractional > increase in size for a large collection of manuals is not a big deal. > That's not enough to make a license non-free.
You have mistaken the objection. There is no reason to think it would be a small fractional increase, especially since little parts of manuals--single paragraphs even--are useful reusable bits just in the way that single functions of Lisp are. > Debian doesn't have a view on this; various Debian developers have > variou views. I have been trying to convince Debian developers that > the GFDL's methods are proper, but you're all entitled to form your > own opinions and make your own decisions. Um, Debian *does* have a view on this.