* Anthony DeRobertis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030915 17:35]: > On Saturday, Sep 13, 2003, at 03:47 US/Eastern, Andreas Barth wrote:
> >That delivering only on such a medium is not ok according to GPL, is > >obvious. It's also obvious that such a medium is not nice. > GPL 6 doesn't say that you may place restrictions on some copies, as > long as your provide an unrestricted copy as well. Instead it says you > may place no restrictions. GPL speaks of legal restrictions. I'm not speaking of legal restrictions, but of putting software on a medium with inherent technical restrictions, and also publishing the source code without any technical restriction. > I don't think you can enforce DRM on GPL software. I didn't say you can enforce DRM on GPL software by law. I just said that you can put GPLed works on DRM-media with any restrictions as long as you also offer the "source code" of this works without restriction. That's not as a way to DRM-control GPLed work. But as a additional way to distribute GPLed work even over DRM-enabled channels - as long as you distribute also an (legaly and technicaly) unrestricted work. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
