Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You have missed the point here, so I'll repeat it. > > I didn't miss the point--I had not even seen it. The point you say I > "missed" was in a message that had not even arrived on my machine when > I wrote those words. I was responding to various points that I recall > having seen others make.
Well, I have mentioned it many times before. > It takes up to 48 hours for me to respond to a message, even if I > write the response as soon as I see it. But sometimes I am even > further behind and don't answer all of one day's messages until the > next day. And if I want to put some thought into the response, it may > be delayed more. To berate and lecture me because you have not > received a response in two days is a cheap shot that illustrates your > general attitude. I was referring to your having missed the point in the very message to which you were replying. Please stay away from the personal accusations; they don't help the discussion.
