Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté : > > > Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Name one. > > > (Note that when you speak of the freedom brought by the GFDL, you > > > cannot consider that the invariant option is surely used) > > > > The old LPPL. > > I would say that the LPPL is not equal. Because it requires you to > change the name of the files you modify and that's a direct problem > when using LaTeX. It's not just like carrying a text in some place > while you are not forced to read it, it "falls directly within that > overall subject" (LaTeX usage).
One of the claims that the LaTeX people made was that it wasn't all that big of a burden. They acknowledged that it was annoying, but did not consider it a fatal defect. Much like the FSF position on invariant sections. Regards, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
