On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:53:56AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 10:08:54AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > Non-free is up in the air for purely administrative issues, and has > > been for a few years; we simply haven't got around to making a > > decision on the matter yet. It'll hopefully happen in the next few > > months; it was stalled behind the voting system amendment for years. > > Not entirely. My proposal to remove non-free from our archives and amend > the social contract to state that it will no longer be available on our FTP > servers is what is in the air.
That should be "to no longer state" rather than "state that it will no longer". -- John
