On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:11:16AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 07:16:51PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > * GAWK: The GNU Awk User's Guide; Edition 2, "for the 3.0.3 (or later) > > version of the GNU implementation of AWK." > > > > This manual's new license is: > > > > Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document > > under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or > > any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with the > > Invariant Sections being "GNU General Public License", the Front-Cover > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > People who like to bitch about the GPL being non-free take note: *this* > time it really is. Contemplate the differences.
I also find it hard to bend my mind in such a way that a copy of the GPL is a section that "deals exclusively with the relationship of the publishers or authors of the Document to the Document's overall subject (or to related matters)". How is this a Secondary Section? (Here's a test: after gawk moves to GPLv3, is it important to keep a copy of the GPLv2 in the documentation? Would you add the GPLv3 as an Invariant Section? If so, why?) Richard Braakman
