On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 12:28:42PM -0400, Brian T. Sniffen wrote: > I think it would be more accurate to say that neither of these > worthies is willing to delay Sarge for removal of GFDL works. The > GNU Emacs, GCC, and GDB maintainers could do so, but have to balance > the freedom of users against the utility of the documentation.
Well, in that case there's tons of non-DFSG-free stuff that we can start moving into main. If utility is sufficient to excuse non-DFSG-freeness, then we don't really need the DFSG at all. -- G. Branden Robinson | The key to being a Southern Debian GNU/Linux | Baptist: It ain't a sin if you [EMAIL PROTECTED] | don't get caught. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Anthony Davidson
pgpUGYDlzcccL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
