On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 02:48:29PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Ah, so in general, when people find a flagrant DFSG violation in main, > the best thing they can do is just leave it alone. Otherwise, it's a > "change", and past inclusion is always sufficient present for future > retention.
No, the best thing to do is to *contact the upstream copyright holder*. That's true whether it's flagrant or not, and given neither myself nor the glibc maintainers are convinced, it's hardly clear that it is. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Is this some kind of psych test? Am I getting paid for this?''
