On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 01:54:10AM -0600, Kevin Rosenberg wrote: > I believe this license is DFSG compliant, Sections 3.1 and 3.2 are > similar to some GPL sections. I wonder about section 3.6 as well.
I don't see any obvious sticking points, however: - This is, inevitably, incompatible with the GPL - and probably some other licenses too. - If a work under this license has relevant patents covering it, we'll have to consider it on a case by case basis. Some of those patent clauses are hairy. If there are no relevant patents, they don't apply and therefore aren't a concern. So background research is needed for anything released under it. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
pgpRuzcPomgRE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
