Alfie's post reminds me that I need clarification on some point: the fact that the Debian logo, which is shipped within many of our packages, is not DFSG-free. It was already raised: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200111/msg00041.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200209/msg00192.html but I don't see any statement on how this should be dealt with.
Is the current status quo to consider it as DFSG-free? Or to consider it doesn't need to? If someone forks Debian and lets the logos in, he would be violating the license because of e.g. the backgrounds. It would be more clever to dual-license it under either the current license or another license; an old-style BSD license with advertising clause or a simple copyleft license come up as reasonable choices. Regards, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
