> Quoting Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > If we distribute it, it is currently not out of the scope of the DFSG. > > If you have a problem with this, write a GR -- but stop with the > > pointless grandstanding.
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Software in Debian is 100% free. That's incorrect. Debian is 100% Free Software. You can read this as (100% Free) Software or as 100% (Free Software), but either way, debian doesn't include non-free non-software. > It doesn't prevent Debian to > distribute something else than software. True. We have non-free for just such a reason. The social contract DOES prevent such things (non-free stuff and non-software stuff) being part of Debian. If it's not free software, it's not debian. Personally, I consider electronic documents to be a subset of "software", so non-free is sufficient to hold GFDL documents. If you'd rather introduce a non-software archive, feel free to propose it. > This is an extreme vision of freedom I do not share. This is a rational vision of freedom which I do share. -- Mark Rafn [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://www.dagon.net/>
