On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 04:44:07AM +0900, Fedor Zuev wrote: > On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >At a cost. While I understand the desire for the invariant > >sections, it can be wondered what freedom is most desirable: the > >freedom to run, study, redistribute and improve for everyone, or > >the freedom to run, study, redistribute and improve for only those > >that agree with your philosophy, and will not remove it from any > >accompanying documentation. > >If people disagree with what you say, you should not prohibit them > >from doing so. You're still a well-known person who can reasonably > >assume that what you write or say will not go unnoticed. Even if > >it's removed from one distribution of a manual. > I cannot see any connection between disagreement with anyone > opinion, and the right to censor somebody else's opinion, so > angrily demanded by you. Censoring somebody else's opinion by doing something like killfilling them? <plonk> -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
pgpEysOjTcDP3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
