On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:54:15PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: > > That doesn't seem to me to be any more non-free than the GPL requiring > > people that distribute binaries also distribute soures. > > It fails the dissident test. The dissidents would not be able to > exchange copies of the covered work in encrypted emails (which they > might have every reason to want to, if the work contains information > that the secret police does not want people to know).
Hmm, good point. I think I at some point got in my mind what I thought they were trying to do, and confused it with what they actually do. >
