Joerg Wendland wrote: >I was asked for my opinion, here it is. I feel the GFDL is "free enough" >for my heart does not beat for the bureaucratic following of iron rules >but for the sake of our users. And our users are not just the readers of >GFDL-licensed documentation but also their authors, and they deserve >freedom, too. This is why I made this very selection and this discussion >ends here.
You said that the GFDL was DFSG free. It's not. It fails the DFSG on multiple counts. Do you really believe tht the GFDL is DFSG free? -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
