On Thursday, Aug 7, 2003, at 07:01 US/Eastern, Lynn Winebarger wrote:
Then the intellectually honest approach is to say the guidelines are
for both software and documentation, not to say the set of software
contains
the set of documentation.
I can only assume that it was easier for the people on debian-legal
(at
least) to stretch the definition of software to cover everything they
wanted
to be free than to get a vote to officially change the guidelines to
reflect
the expansion.
I'd like to know more about this "intellectual honesty" that compels
the word "software" to include documentation when used in the Social
Contract, but not when used a little further down the page[0] in the
guidelines.
Debian Will Remain 100% Free Software
We promise to keep the Debian GNU/Linux Distribution entirely
free software. As there are many definitions of free software,
we include the guidelines we use to determine if software is
"free" below....
[0] http://www.debian.org/social_contract.html
