Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BZZT. That is exactly the argument John just asked us not to make.
I think your buzzer is malfunctioning. John seemed to be asking us not to stretch the DFSG to non-software. Not the same thing. [Software/Docs distinction] > So's this. And it's been said a hundred times before, so why repeat it > again and waste all of our time? I don't know. I just post it to try to get a response that actually has some substance. I'd love to hear from someone who actually has a basis in reality for a distinction, instead of something from their mind. Does anyone have *NEW DATA* to bring to the discussion? Otherwise, we can continue hearing the opinions of a few that we should allow non-free software works into Debian because they like it, regardless of the problems of distinguishing or justification, and then ignore them just as happened over other pieces of non-free.
