[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian T. Sniffen) writes: > And, despite what you've been arguing against, > > * Copyright (c) 2003 Sample Author
I have not been arguing against this. Adding extra stuff is fine, provided it doesn't materially impede clarity, and this of course doesn't impede clarity. I'm arguing against a note that says: * (C) 2003 Sample Author > Yup. And despite your repeated rants about references, there's still > nothing that says "and adding an extraneous symbol voids your copyright." Of course, and I have said nothing of the kind. I have said that (c) doesn't substitute for one of the officially statutorily approved things. Adding extra stuff is pointless, but perfectly legal, and harmless. Thomas
