Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Friday, May 23, 2003, at 01:45 PM, Stephen Ryan wrote: > >> On Fri, 2003-05-23 at 09:52, Brian T. Sniffen wrote: >> >> The other option, of course, is that the kernel exec() function *is* a >> barrier, Debian *can* be used for real work and not just an exercise in >> ivory-tower masturbation.
Whoa! Those are not my words. I'm not quite sure whose they are. > Well, I don't believe exec is a magic copyright barrier; instead, I > think we need to generalize _why_ we generally consider it be one. But this leads me to believe that we may well be on common ground; what generalization do you see there? -Brian
