On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 09:52:16AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > En réponse à James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes: > > > > > As long as I am a GNU Emacs user, I object to see the Emacs manual > > > going to non-free. Currently, it is provided by the emacs package > > > and I'm able to read it from emacs itself as soon as the package > > > is installed. > > > So, from the user point of view, I don't see any benefit of moving > > > it elsewhere.
> > Wow! You're so right! Let's get rid of this silly DFSG thing and move > > all software to main, it'd be so much more convenient from a user > > point of view!! Yeesh. > I'm talking about documentation which comes with free software from > GNU. You deliberately removed the last part of my message, and that's > make your reply even more trollish. So does this mean I can include my shareware fonts and my for-educational-use-only documentation in my next package upload? The software is free, so I guess it's ok to let these other things into main along with it -- right? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
pgp0dLp1vnbDz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
