Scripsit Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> > ?) The GFDL is not free when applied to documents if any of > > the "invariant" or "cover" options are exercised. > Is it a consensus on debian-legal that a GFDL work *without* any > Invariant or Cover is indeed free and has no problem being distributed > in "main"? I believe so. There is some fudging about the precise definition of opaque and transparent formats, but I'm not aware that anyone thinks they would be showstoppers in and of themselves. -- Henning Makholm "So? We're adaptable. We'll *switch missions*!"
