Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Alex Romosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> WHY-FREE is not documentation! it is a manifesto in which rms expounds >> on his views on free software. > > It doesn't really matter whether it's documentation or not. The > question is, is it free?
people, dfsg, fsf, free, non-free all deal with _software_. i think that the people who try to expand the free-software concept to documentation are misguided (although i can see a scenario where by changing the software you also need to change the documentation). in no way, shape, or form do i think anybody should have the right to edit somebody else's political statement. the WHY-FREE manifesto is the cornerstone of the whole free software movement (including debian) and as such it should be immutable (and, of course, included in debian). --alex-- -- | I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active | | advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with | | automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion | | and thus to help to discredit completely the world of reality. |
