On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 10:20:50PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote: > > But you're right that none of the notices you quote describe DFSG-free > > licensing terms. Feel free to join the ongoing quasiflamewar in the > > LGPL thread about the degree to which we care about that in the case > > of Stallman's essays. > If you think so, we're going to have a hard time dealing with this > then.
Why do you think that? It affects a reasonable number of texts, and will take some time to deal with, but it's not remotely difficult. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
pgpFWHL7Vo2CF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
