On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 06:20:27PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > instead of a document > like this one that warns about and criticises the FDL, perhaps Debian > should issue a more general statement along the lines of: We have > decided documentation in Debian must comply with the DFSG, and this will > entail throwing the following documents out of the distribution, and > certian licenses (FDL etc) are causing problems in this task. Just an > idea and I don't feel like writing it myself, but it might be less > inflammatory.
I think we probably need this too, but it can't be instead of a thing about the FDL, since otherwise we'd just get "But the GNU FDL's a free license -- it says so right in the name -- why're you throwing stuff licensed under it out?" Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
pgpK223VZjOXS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
