On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 10:15:56AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Richard Braakman wrotes:
> > 1. The GPL is DFSG-free by definition > > 2. The author is interpreting GPL 2(c) in a legally valid way > > 3. Therefore, the condition is also DFSG-free > That's my point of view. We have judge Mr.F.Burzi and found him guilty. We have done no such thing. This is not a court of law, and we should not be attaching a stigma of "guilt" to a decision that a license doesn't qualify for main (the stigma of "non-free" serves our aims just as well). If you want to convict Mr. Burzi, his ego and his shoddy code would make much better targets than his license. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
pgpgQefZAXM19.pgp
Description: PGP signature
